Sunday, June 12, 2016

Lo/No Pay Is The Way to Go

In a perfect world, we’re all getting paid to do this work. The tenets of independent cinema are based on a system of “lo/no pay work”. It’s a rite of passage for anyone looking to break into industry, much like an unpaid intern starting at a brokerage firm down on Wall Street. The world is run on the backs of the unpaid intern. Why should that be any different for indie film?

Movies like “Clerks” and “Slacker” aren’t getting finished if Kevin Smith and Richard Linklater are paying for every single person working on their movies. The world would not have performances from Bill Murray in “Rushmore” ($9000) or Ryan Gosling in “Half Nelson” ($1000 a week) if we’re making sure everyone gets paid what they deserve when it comes to indie film.

Movies cost money and post-production costs eat up most of the budget. If it’s down to paying all the grips and electric their regular, industry standard rate versus the finishing funds needed to have the best color-correction and audio mix available, I’m sorry, but I’m finding a crew who will work for copy and credit. The final product is more important than who works on the set. All I really need is one solid person, who can wear multiple hats during the production to drag along those less experienced.

And isn’t that what working on a crew for lo/no pay is all about? The experience.

Understand that I’m not advocating not paying anything at all. Aside from the food that would be provided, there could be a small rate offered to those in key positions of the crew. With the alternative of getting paid nothing, a small rate would go a long way to helping shape a more interested crew. A cinematographer getting $75 a day is less likely to walk off set over a disagreement about lighting placement, as would one who is working for no money at all.

Let’s look at the genesis of most indie films. A few friends, all in the industry in some form or another, are hanging out one night bemoaning the state of movies. They complain about how the productions they work for are generating terrible movies.

Why would someone like this?
This isn’t funny!
We could do better than that movie.

Boom. An indie film is born. Most of these independent productions are filled with friends looking to create something special. They’re looking to put their stamp on modern cinema with their story. It’s about the story. It’s about the craft. It’s about the art. As soon as one starts wondering about getting paid for their work, the magic dies. It becomes a job and not a calling.

Telling a story with your friends is special. Looking to get paid to help friends is petty. When people start getting paid what they think they should be paid, it has now become a job and the inevitable complaining about the job begins. The work suffers. The movie suffers. The relationships suffer. What once began as a chance to experience something unique with friends is now tearing those same friends apart. It happens all the time. As soon as money enters the picture, it ruins the specialness of the movie-making experience.

Money ruins everything.


5 comments:

  1. Alex, I've agreed so much with all of your writing, based upon your experiences and such. I feel like I've watched Clerks 1&2 DOGMA, Chasing Amy, Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back...the list goes on. I don't know if I've ever felt like that genre, or in the case of Wes Anderson films- Bill Murray that these people really care a lot about the money...maybe they do? Money is evil. It makes others so damn greedy. The relationships of people suffer because money gets in the way. Kevin Smith is a genius no doubt. Wes is too. Money takes away, it doesn't give.

    -LR

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Money is a necessary evil. Definitely. I think spending money on the right thing is important. But this is a business and many people who get into indie film don't understand that. They think that they have a vision and people should give them whatever they need for that vision. And unless they're the incarnation of John Ford, that's a tough sell.

      Thanks for reading!

      Delete
  2. Hello Faison,

    I remember working a few internships where a few people I knew worked but did not get paid. The company was looking for certain positions that offered experience but no money. Those who were not paid worked and completed their tasks but the drive wasn't there. There was no incentive to stay later or go the extra mile. I know that perhaps the passion just wasn't there for them and they should have done all they could to make the best impression. Anyways, I guess my point is that money shouldn't be a driving force for something you are passionate about. Unfortunately there are many people who won't give their all unless there is money involved.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely. For many people money shades their view over their work ethic, which is unfortunate. And people think that if they get the right job with the right pay, their work ethic will soar to new heights. But that's just wrong, because they would eventually something to gripe about and their work would suffer. People who are passionate will work hard no matter the pay and those are the people that should be rewarded. Thanks for reading.

      Delete
  3. Alex, I agree with you to some extent. I've always thought that we shouldn't have to work at jobs, we should all be able to pursue our passions with the caveat that we get paid to do so. Otherwise, how we gonna live? So, passion first but like you said, money is a necessity, so of course people want to get paid because they've got someone barking up the arss for a payment they owe. Best thing is to be able to pay all your friends so they can afford to take time out to work on your vision. Woof!

    ReplyDelete